Privacy and terms of service
(JP¥2,180)
Text are automatically translated.
Report translation issueFraud prevention
Customer support
Refund support for customers
Item condition
Brand New
Ships from
Japan
Category
Bundle & Save : Our users save an average of 35% on shipping fees by bundling multiple items!
Something went wrong, please try again later.
Something went wrong, please try again later.
This item has been stored at home. It is in very good condition, but there is some aging on the cover and other areas due to its age. We appreciate your understanding. Emergency Publication! The "Scars" Left by the Ishihara Tokyo Administration Expression restrictions of the Youth Development Ordinance, Olympic bid, Tsukiji Market relocation, massive deficit of the New Bank of Tokyo, and repeated discriminatory remarks. Thoroughly examining the 12-year Ishihara Tokyo administration. The Ishihara administration lasted for a long period of three terms, twelve years. The Youth Development Ordinance, which threatened freedom of expression, the New Bank of Tokyo, which went bankrupt with a massive deficit, and the Olympic bid, which wasted a huge amount of money. Furthermore, repeated discriminatory remarks against foreigners and people with disabilities. What did he leave behind in Tokyo? -- Revised and retitled from "The Problem of the Empty Little Emperor "Shintaro Ishihara"". From Reviews: This book examines Ishihara, closely following his comments and episodes to reveal his true nature. Although it is a second edition paperback, recent topics such as the Youth Development Ordinance and the New Bank issue have been added. Ishihara's re-election as governor was probably the judgment of the citizens of Tokyo that he was better than a former criminal comedian or a power harassment manager, but Ishihara's misuse of public funds is clearly a crime, and his various discriminatory remarks far exceed the realm of harassment. I certainly got the impression that he was the person described in the subtitle. He casually abandoned his previous policies and political ideologies depending on the current trends and his own mood, and he didn't have any significant achievements even when he was a member of the Diet. The same can be said for his time as governor. He was not only self-serving and arrogant, but also lacked sincerity and empathy. This is well known from his numerous words and actions. He seems to be an unsuitable person for a politician. The only things that can be evaluated are his speaking skills and image-making.
2 weeks ago