Thank you for viewing! m(__)m 《No comments, instant purchase OK》 《If you want same-day shipping, please consult before purchasing》 《New, unused, and free shipping》 Pannier/Pannier Skirt Length 48cm ・Color: Black 【Size】 Waist stretch range Flat measurement approx. 25cm to approx. 43cm (approx. 50cm to approx. 86cm) Skirt length approx. 48cm The waist is elastic, so it stretches quite a bit! When paired with a dress or skirt, it creates a charming, fluffy silhouette. Perfect for cosplay, Lolita fashion, and gothic styles♪ The waist is elastic and fits a wide range of sizes! This is a very popular fluffy pannier (^^) This pannier skirt can add volume to skirts and dresses for cosplay, Lolita fashion, weddings, etc.♪♪ It has a three-layer structure that enhances the splendor of costumes and skirts. It is also breathable and provides a comfortable wearing experience. The wide waist stretch range allows for comfortable wear. It can be used in a wide range of situations, from everyday use to special occasions and photoshoots♪♪ Notes ◎Product photos are taken to match the actual color as much as possible, but may differ from the actual product depending on the monitor environment, lighting, and angle. ◎The design, specifications, packaging, and tags of the product may change from the image depending on the time of arrival. ◎Due to different quality standards from Japan, there may be minor scratches, glue overflow, slight stains, loose stitching, fraying, thin fabric, or odors specific to dyes. ◎To sell at an affordable price, we will use simple packaging. ◎Items described as new and unused have been opened once for inspection and photography. ＊Returns and refunds are not possible after evaluation. Please contact us before evaluation if you have any issues. ＊Please refrain from purchasing if you are looking for perfection. We also have various other products for sale. We plan to increase our products in the future, so please take a look if you'd like♪ We also offer discounts if you purchase multiple items, so feel free to comment. 361