“The Autism Trial: The Crime and Punishment of the Lesser Panda Hat Man” Mikio Sato Why was the Asakusa Women's Junior College student (Lesser Panda Hat) murder case, positioned as the first leading case of an autism trial, treated as a mere "heinous random" murder case? Just as the perpetrator support movement that does not face the victim is ineffective, the media, which is in league with the prosecution and only spews out reports and discussions of "criminal responsibility," and the judiciary, which is satisfied with imposing severe punishment, are fundamentally making the same mistake. Without an understanding of "disability" that leads to genuine recidivism prevention, such tragedies will be repeated. - A problem work that, after four years of thorough investigation, clarifies important issues that the judiciary, education, welfare, and forensic psychiatry have avoided. [Table of Contents] The Man in the Lesser Panda Hat in Asakusa Perpetrator/Victim - Until Arrest Reporting - What Was Hidden Trial (1) - "Silence" at the First Trial Victim (1) - The Family Album, Its Sudden Blank Space Trial (2) - How Was "Disability" Perceived? Trial (3) - The Battle over "Autism" Perpetrator (1) - "Why Don't You Look Up?" The Man Was Questioned Perpetrator (2) - The End of Wandering Victim (2) - "I Don't Want to Forget the Memories or the Voice..." Perpetrator (3) - The Place Brought by the "Student's Incident" Trial (4) - Suppressed Witness Testimony Trial (5) - Who Said, "I'll Kill and Make It Mine"? Trial (6) - How Were They Judged? Victim (3) - "Isn't it you in the media who are corrupting this country?" Perpetrator (4) - Responsibility and Atonement Trial (7) - Each Verdict The Final Requiem The cover, top edge, and obi have significant stains, but there are no stains in the text, and there is no problem with reading. #MikioSato #Book #JapaneseLiterature/Essays